Legal Opinion

Magill v. Watson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 9, 2013No. 01-12-00051-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHERRY RADACK, Chief Justice.

After a jury trial on a seller’s claim arising out of the breach of an earnest money contract, the trial court signed a judgment awarding the seller of real property the earnest money, plus liquidated damages in an amount equal to three times the earnest money, as provided in the contract, and attorney’s fees, interest, and costs. On appeal, the buyer (1) challenges the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the suit, (2) contends that the liquidated damages clause of the contract is an unenforceable penalty, and (3) argues that the evidence that the buyer breached…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Croucher v. CroucherTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Ltd. v. Williamson County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gary Wayne Jaster v. Comet II Construction, Inc., Joe H. Schneider, Laura H. Schneider, and Austin Design GroupTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Michael D. Lee v. the Rogers Agency, C. Michael Rogers, and New York Life Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2016
  3. McGinnes Industrial Maintenance Corporation v. the Phoenix Insurance Company and the Travelers Indemnity CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Wendolyn Messner, as Dependent Administrator v. Mark L. Boon, and Boon Shaver Echols Coleman & Goolsby, P.L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
  5. DrinkPAK v. PRIII/Crow Building CTexas Business Court · 2026

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API