Legal Opinion

McDermott v. Halleck

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 5, 1902No. 12,578PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from Dickinson district court; O. L. Moore, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pollock, J.:

Thomas Kirby was the owner of a private bank, conducted under the name of the Thomas Kirby Bank. At the same time he. acted as the agent of plaintiff in error, who resided at Jamestown, Pa., in the business of loaning money on real estate in Dickinson county. Among other loans by him made was one to F. R. Carpenter, in amount $2600, secured by a second mortgage on a half-section of land, the first mortgage being for $6000 to one Doctor Austin. Proceedings to foreclose these mortgages were instituted. Personal judgments- were entered on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harper v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. First Nat. Bank v. SwanWyoming Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Sharman v. HuotMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Decker v. HouseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. Slobodisky v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Powell v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Ginn v. KnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Chivers v. Board of Com'rs of Johnston CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. In Re Guardianship of ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. King v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API