Legal Opinion
Sharman v. Huot
Montana Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 1898PublishedCited by 30 opinions
Appeal from District Cov/rt, Gallatin County. F. K. Armstrong, Judge. Action by Helen G. Sharman against Frank Huot, aided by attachment. From two separate orders discharging the writ of attachment on motions of defendant and M. J. Eukes, intervenor, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtPigott, J.
These are appeals from two separate orders discharging a writ of attachment.
From the transcript in No. 1,068 it appears that the plaintiff filed her complaint on February 25, 1897, and that the ■sheriff thereupon received a certain paper, which gave the title of the cause and the style of the action, and proceeded thus :
“The State of Montana to the above-named defendant: You are hereby summoned to answer the complaint in this action which is filed in the office of the clerk of this court, a copy of which is herewith served upon you, and to file your answer and serve a copy thereof upon the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lyman v. MiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Whitney v. BrunetteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- People ex rel. Macey v. HillsdaleNew York Supreme Court · 1807
- Dexter v. CochranSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Choate v. SpencerMontana Supreme Court · 1893
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Burke v. Inter-State Savings & Loan Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1901
- Hamilton v. HamiltonMontana Supreme Court · 1916
- In re FarrellMontana Supreme Court · 1907
- Beach v. Spokane Ranch & Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
- Holt v. SatherMontana Supreme Court · 1928
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.