Needles v. Kansas City
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BOHLING, Commissioner.
Plaintiffs Enoch R. Needles, Ruben N. Bergendoff, Ellis E. Paul, Theodore J. Cambem, Josef Sorkin, James P. Exum, Elmer K. Timby and Carl L. Erb are partners engaged in business as consulting engineers under the name of Howard, Needles, Tammen & Bergendoff with fully staffed offices in Kansas City, Missouri, New York, New York, and elsewhere. The firm originated in Kansas City and has specialized in major bridges, turnpikes and interstate highway systems. The plaintiffs, herein referred to as “Engineers,” sued the City of Kansas City, Missouri, in three counts. They…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Donovan v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Kansas City v. RathfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- Fulton v. City of LockwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Burger v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Mickelberry's Food Products Co. v. HaeussermannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Triarch Industries, Inc. v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- Twin River Construction Co. v. Public Water District No. 6Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Wilshire Construction Co. v. Union Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- Nokota Feeds, Inc. v. State Bank of LakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- Durant v. Department of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.