Legal Opinion

United States v. Blasingame

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 14, 1900No. 7PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Criminal Prosecution. On demurrer to information.

1Opinion of the Court

WELEBORN, District Judge.

I am of opinion that the act entitled “An act making appropriations for sundry civil expenses of the government for the fiscal year ending June thirtieth, eighteen hundred and ninety-eight, and for other purposes” (Act June 4, 1897) 30 Stat. 11), in so far as it declares to be a crime any violation of the rules and regulations thereafter to be made by the secretary of the interior for the protection of forest reservations, is, in substance and effect, a delegation of legislative power to an administrative officer. While the supreme court of the United States, in Field…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. In Re KollockSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. People v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Board of Harbor Commissioners v. Excelsior Redwood Co.California Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sperry & Hutchinson Company, Plff. In Err., VSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. St. Louis Merchants' Bridge Terminal Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  3. United States v. MaidDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1902
  4. United States v. MatthewsDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1906
  5. United States v. HooverDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API