Legal Opinion

United States v. Matthews

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided May 7, 1906PublishedCited by 11 opinions

On Demurrer to Indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

WHITSON, District Judge.,

The defendant was indicted for having on the 11th day of September, 1905, “wrongfully, unlawfully, and without the permit required by law and the regulations made by the Secretary of Agriculture,” grazed sheep on the Mount Rainier Forest Reserve. The indictment was framed under the act approved June 4, 1897, entitled “An act making appropriations for sundry civil expenses of the government for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1898, and for other purposes” (chapter 2, 30 Stat. 11 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3768]), and the act approved February 1, 1905, entitled “An act…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  3. Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. United States v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Morrill v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sperry & Hutchinson Company, Plff. In Err., VSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. United States v. RizzinelliDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1910
  3. United States v. SugarDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1917
  4. United States v. MoodyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1908
  5. United States v. HaasU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API