Legal Opinion

W. H. Edgar & Son v. Grocers' Wholesale Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 9, 1924No. 6382PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SYMES, District Judge.

Counsel for defendant in error insist in their petition for a rehearing that the court should have given a definite meaning to the words “causes which render performance commercially impracticable,” found in the contract for the sale and purchase of the sugar. Those words occur in the sentence reading this way: “All contracts subject to strikes, fires, transportation and business conditions and other extraneous causes which render performance commercially impracticable.” For these reasons it did not seem to us necessary to do so: (1) It'did not appear from the, evidence…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mineral Park Land Co. v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Wooters v. International & G. N. R. R. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. LowensteinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  4. Ellis v. Cricket Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Desportes v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  2. Curry v. Pleasurecraft Marine Engine Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2013
  3. Congress v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API