Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Lowenstein

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 2, 1899No. 1,180PublishedCited by 21 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri.

1Opinion of the Court

THAYER, Circuit Judge.

This action is founded on a policy of accident insurance which was issued to Emanuel Lowenstein, of Kansas City, Mo., the husband, in Ms lifetime, of Bophia Lowenstein, the defendant in error, who was the plaintiff in the trial court. The policy took effect originally on January 16, 1886, for the term of one year, hut was renewed for another year on January 16, 1807, as the plaintiff below claimed, and as the jury appear to have found. The policy in suit insured the plaintiff’s husband, Emanuel Lowenstein, “against bodily injuries sustained through external, violent, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Manufacturers' Accident Indemnity Co. v. DorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  3. Paul v. . Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Pickett v. Pacific M. L. Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Warren County1891
  5. McGlother v. Provident Mut. Acc. Co. of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hawkeye Commercial Men's Ass'n v. ChristyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  2. Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Moon v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Buel v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  5. McFarland v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API