Rodgers v. Village of Menomonee Falls
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
There are three issues presented on this appeal:(1) Should sec. 62.23 (7) (d), Stats., be construed so as to make the area of potential protest the area adjacent to and 100 feet from the boundary line of the property of the party seeking the zoning change, rather than the property for which rezoning is sought;(2) Should the resolution passed by the school district at its annual meeting be treated as a valid protest to the petition for rezoning; and(3) Was the rezoning of the 42-acre parcel illegal spot zoning?
Statutory area of permissible protest.
Appellants argue that the 100-foot boundary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Buhler v. Racine CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Heaton v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Higbee v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Armstrong v. McInnisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Cushman v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Eadie v. Town BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Schwarz v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Howard v. Village of Elm GroveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- BANANA RIVER PRO. v. City of Cocoa BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Pfaff v. City of LakewoodColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.