Legal Opinion

Ago

Washington Attorney General Reports

Decided August 27, 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

State Representative, 32nd District Olympia, WA 98504-0600 P.O. Box 40600

Dear Representative Kagi:

By letter previously acknowledged, you have requested our opinion with respect to the following question:

May a municipal sewer district repair or replace private side sewers as part of a district-wide infiltration and inflow reduction program where (a) aging and inadequate side sewers are the most significant contributor to infiltration and inflow in the district's entire system; (b) the purpose of the program is to benefit the district and the public through lower long-term capital and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. CLEAN v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Japan Line, Ltd. v. McCaffreeWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Okeson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Okeson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API