Legal Opinion

Benton v. Associated Indemnity Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1938No. 27123. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This case has been twice before this court, Hinton v. Carmody, 182 Wash. 123, 45 P. (2d) 32, and the garnishment case brought by the judgment creditor decided in Hinton v. Carmody, 186 Wash. 242, 57 P. (2d) 1240, 60 P. (2d) 1108. The facts and issues may be found in those decisions, and will not be repeated here. The only additional facts necessary to recite are that, after several writs of garnishment had been sued out by Hinton, the judgment creditor, as administrator, Carmody, the judgment debtor, went into bankruptcy, and this appellant was appointed trustee therein. Immediately after his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Citizens Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Dodson v. Continental Can Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Reutenik v. Gibson Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Howe v. Whitman CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. First National Bank v. OppenheimerWashington Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beal v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Beal for Martinez v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WachsmithWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In Re Perrigo's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Beal v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API