Legal Opinion · Dissent

Goins v. Puleo

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1998No. COA97-1071Published

1Dissent

Judge Martin, John C.,

dissenting.

I agree with the majority that a genuine issue of fact exists as to whether the statue of limitations was tolled pursuant to the continuing course of treatment doctrine; therefore I agree that summary judgment in favor of defendants based on the statute of limitations was error. I must respectfully disagree, however, with the majority’s disposition of defendants’ cross-assignment of error.

Defendants have cross-assigned as error the trial court’s failure to grant summary judgment on the grounds that facts established by plaintiff’s failure to respond to their…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carawan v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Rhoads v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. McDowell v. Estate of AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API