Legal Opinion

United States v. Evin Alexi Licona-Lopez

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 18, 1998No. 98-1778PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWMAN, Chief Judge.

Evin Alexi Licona-Lopez appeals the denial by the District Court 1 of his motion for an evidentiary hearing on the government’s failure to move for a substantial-assistance departure under § 5K1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Licona-Lopez participated in a controlled drug transaction and gave trial testimony which helped convict a co-conspirator. The government claimed it did not move for a substantial-assistance departure because Licona-Lopez withheld important information until trial and prejudiced the government’s case against the co-conspirator.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wade v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. Lershawn Vincent KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Brian Ashley Martin, United States of America v. Brian Ashley Martin, United States of America v. Brian Ashley MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Thomas L. RomseyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Peter Alden Drown, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Andrew Niccademous TylerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Timothy Dean WolfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Phillip Alexander JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Bernard WilkersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. James Alan PamperinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API