Legal Opinion

Armco, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 1989No. 2562 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLATT, Senior Judge.

Armco, Inc. (petitioner) petitions for our review of the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the referee’s decision awarding benefits to Edward T. Kollar (claimant), pursuant to Section 306(c) of *290The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act).1 We will affirm.

The claimant was employed by the petitioner from September 6, 1944 through November 15, 1985. During his entire period of employment, he was exposed to loud noises, and in 1983, he began to notice that he had a hearing problem. Finally, on August 5, 1986, he was examined by Dr.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. HartliebSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Killian v. Heintz Div. Kelsey HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Wilcox v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Steele v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Iervolino v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API