Legal Opinion

Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELLEGRINI, Judge.

Hulbert Russell (Claimant) petitions for review of the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the decision of the Referee denying Claimant specific loss benefits for a loss of hearing.1

Claimant worked for Cooper Bessemer (Employer) for 26 years as a chipper, crane-man, foundry worker and laborer. In those positions, Claimant was exposed to loud and continuous noise made by the machines which he operated or which were operated in close proximity to his work place. Although Claimant wore some ear protection in the later years, he had already begun…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. HartliebSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Armco, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Hill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Daye v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Pettola v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Kuzniar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Lynch v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Aristech Chemical Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API