Legal Opinion

Iervolino v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1988No. Appeal No. 2801 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Kalish,

Anthony Iervolino (claimant) seeks review of an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which denied benefits to him for a specific loss of hearing pursuant to section 306(c)(8) of The Pennsylvania Workmens Compensation Act (Act).1 We affirm.

Claimant was employed in the Machine Shop and Forge Shop at Union Switch and Signal Company for about thirty-two years. He filed a claim petition alleging a specific loss of hearing in both ears due to constant and excessive loud noise at work. The referee found that claimant suffered a work-related loss of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pare v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bible v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Bible v. COM., DEPT. OF LABOR AND IND.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Boeing Helicopter Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Armco, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API