Legal Opinion
International Curtis Marine Turbine Co. v. William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Bldg. Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 20, 1916No. 263PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Equity. Suit by the International Curtis Marine Turbine Company and the Curtis Marine Turbine Company of the United States against the William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Company. On rehearing sur defendant’s motion to exclude evidence before special master.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
Since the argument upon the rehearing, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in 231 Fed. 1021, - C. C. A. -, has affirmed the decree of Judge Hough in the case of Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company of America v. Emil J. Simon, 227 Fed. 906, upon Judge Hough’s opinion; Judge Ward dissenting. Judge Hough in his opinion said:
“The questions, therefore, become the following: (1) What is the legal position of the sovereign in respect of patent rights granted by itself under the Act of 1910? (2) How does that act, or more accurately the legal position of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crozier v. Fried. Krupp AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. SimonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1915
- International Curtis Marine Turbine Co. v. William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
- Foster Hose Supporter Co. v. Thomas P. Taylor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
3Cited by1 opinion
- International Curtis Marine Turbine Co. v. William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917