Legal Opinion

Foster Hose Supporter Co. v. Thomas P. Taylor Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 8, 1912No. 125PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut.

1Per curiam

Thomas P. Taylor is the owner of a nonassignable license from the complainant’s assignor to manufacture and sell hose supporters *1004under letters patent 638.540. He manufactured these hose supporters, along with a large variety oí other articles, until September 26, 1907, when he organized the Thomas P. Taylor Company, the defendant corporation, to which he conveyed his factory, machinery, stock on hand etc., in exchange for all the capital stock except three shares, each of which was put in the name of other persons to qualify them as directors. He did not assign the license in question to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Foster Hose Supporter Co. v. Thomas P. Taylor Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. SimonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1915
  2. Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Kilbourne & Clark Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1916
  3. International Curtis Marine Turbine Co. v. William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Bldg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Cutting & Washington Radio Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API