American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
I have duly considered the opinion of the Supreme Court (53 S. Ct. 721, 729, 77 L. Ed. 1331) on the affirmance by it of the judgments of the Circuit Court of Appeals in the two suits in equity brought in the District Court for the Southern District of New York (1 F. Supp. 809) by Benjamin F. Johnson and Lillian Boehm, respectively, against the Manhattan Railway Company et al. [Johnson v. Manhattan Ry. Co. (C. C. A.) 61 F.(2d) 934, 937]. The opinion discusses the exercise of jurisdiction by me in the above-entitled suit of the American Brake Shoe & Foundry Company against…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Ex Parte American Steel Barrel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Johnson v. Manhattan Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1933