Ransom Gant v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.
This appeal from a jury conviction for wilfully failing to appear for trial as required challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to convict and claims that prejudicial comment by the trial court denied appellant a fair trial. We affirm.
The indictment upon which appellant was convicted charged that appellant, having been arrested on the charge of violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2421, and having been released pursuant to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3146 upon a $10,000 secured bond and his promise to appear at all his scheduled hearings as required by the United…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Robert Bolivar DepughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Carios Lamont Scruggs v. United States of America, Reginald Coleman Chambers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Smith F. Brandom, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. ReedDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. NataleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. De Jesus-BatresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Dale Francis Catches v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Edgar CarterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Carlton Eugene Martin, United States of America v. Michael Keith ScottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.