United States v. Smith F. Brandom, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
The principal question1 on appeal is whether the trial judge impermissibly commented on the evidence in his charge to the jury, thus, in effect, directing a verdict. We hold that it did so, and reverse the defendant’s conviction.
The defendant was convicted on Counts I, II, III and XI of the indictment which charged him with violating the mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1341.2 The evidence showed that the de*832fendant operated the Midwest Mutual Casualty Company and its management company, Gibraltar Management Corporation. The essence of the charge was that the defendant had…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Billeci v. United States. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. ChanthadaraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,032 United States of America v. Edward Henry Ashdown and Charles E. Graham, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. PoolCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- State v. EcholsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- United States v. Steven Earl NeumannCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.