Legal Opinion

City of San Antonio v. Chas. M. Stieff, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 27, 1935No. 9437PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Justice.

Appellee, Chas. M. Stieff, Inc., a Maryland corporation, as plaintiff, instituted this suit against appellant, city of San Antonio, as defendant, seeking to recover the sum of $1,300, together with interest, representing the purchase price of a certain piano delivered to, the city of Sam Antonio by Walthall Music Company, a Texas corporation. Appellee’s petition also contained a count seeking in the alternative to recover the reasonable market value of this piano.

The facts are as follows: The Walthall Music Company had been in the retail music business in the city of San…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mack v. Drummond Tobacco Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Willys-Overland Co. of California v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Eason v. DelongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. Northern Electrical Manufacturing Co. v. J. C. Wagner Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Yoder v. HaworthNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Charles M. Stieff, Inc. v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. United States v. Menier Hardware No. 1, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1963
  4. United States v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1938
  5. Rotelli v. JackvonySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API