Legal Opinion

Valentine v. Nebuad, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 4, 2011No. C08-05113 TEHPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.

This matter came before the Court on Defendant NebuAd’s motion to dismiss. After carefully considering the parties’ written arguments, the Court finds oral argument to be unnecessary. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED.

BACKGROUND

This lawsuit arises out of a practice of tracking individuals’ internet habits and harnessing that data to sell and deliver targeted advertisements based on their web browsing history. NebuAd contracted with internet service providers (“ISPs”) to install devices on their networks…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Yahoo Mail LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. Hendricks v. Starkist Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  3. NovelPoster v. Javitch Canfield GroupDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. BronsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. List Interactive, Ltd. v. Knights of ColumbusDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API