Legal Opinion

State v. Mohler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1998No. 87S01-9709-PC-497PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

SULLIVAN, Justice.

In Bryant v. State, 660 N.E.2d 290 (Ind.1995), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 293, 136 L.Ed.2d 213 (1996), we held that because Indiana’s Controlled Substance Excise Tax is a punishment, the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a criminal prosecution for an underlying drug offense' after that tax has been assessed. However, this new rule is not retroactive under Daniels v. State, 561 N.E.2d 487 (Ind.1990), and so does not entitle Guy A. Mohler to post-conviction relief.

Background

In December, 1993, the State charged Guy A. Mohler (“Mohler”) with possession of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Membres v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Conrad v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Fosha v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Fulkrod v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Jacobs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API