State v. Mohler
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION TO TRANSFER
SULLIVAN, Justice.
In Bryant v. State, 660 N.E.2d 290 (Ind.1995), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 293, 136 L.Ed.2d 213 (1996), we held that because Indiana’s Controlled Substance Excise Tax is a punishment, the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a criminal prosecution for an underlying drug offense' after that tax has been assessed. However, this new rule is not retroactive under Daniels v. State, 561 N.E.2d 487 (Ind.1990), and so does not entitle Guy A. Mohler to post-conviction relief.
Background
In December, 1993, the State charged Guy A. Mohler (“Mohler”) with possession of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Membres v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Conrad v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Fosha v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Fulkrod v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Jacobs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.