Fulkrod v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SULLIVAN, Judge.
Appellant, Richard Fulkrod, appeals the denial of his motion to correct erroneous sentence. Upon appeal, Fulkrod presents two issues for our review: (1) whether in imposing a forty-year sentence the trial court violated his rights as set forth in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 LEd.2d 403 (2004), reh'g denied, and (2) whether the decision in Blakely is a new rule of law which should be applied retroactively.
*1065We affirm.
In February 1992, the State charged Fulkrod with murder after he shot his estranged wife four times during an argument, killing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Smylie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Walker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. MohlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Paul D. Woodcox v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Artie Thomas v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Cory Richard Webster v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- Damien R. Fayson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- David Drummond v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.