Legal Opinion
Rosner v. Codata Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 23, 1996No. 91 Civ. 2967 (DNE)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 56, plaintiff pro se Steven Ros-ner (“Rosner” or “plaintiff’) and defendants have cross moved for summary judgment on plaintiffs claims of copyright infringement, fraud, conversion, unjust enrichment, and misappropriation of technology. Because this Court finds that each of plaintiffs claims is barred by the applicable statute of limitations, defendants’ motions for summary judgment are granted. In addition, because this Court finds that genuine issues of material fact exist such that plaintiff is…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Black Radio Network, Inc. v. Nynex Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Manginaro v. Welfare Fund of Local 771, IATSEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Auscape International v. National Geographic SocietyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Armstrong v. Virgin Records, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Lawyers' Fund v. Gateway State BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.