Legal Opinion
Manginaro v. Welfare Fund of Local 771, IATSE
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 27, 1998No. 96 Civ. 5545(MBM)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■ OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Florence Manginaro, as guardian for her son, Austin Scott Manginaro (“Scott”), and Austin Manginaro, Scott’s father, sue the Welfare Fund of Local 771, I.A.T.S.E. (the “Fund”), the Fund’s current and former trustees (the “Trustees”), and the Union Labor Life Insurance Company (“ULLICO”), alleging that defendants refused to pay certain of Scott’s medical expenses in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1140 et seq. (1994). ULLICO counterclaims for reimbursement of medical expenses it has already paid…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Sally J. Burke v. Kodak Retirement Income Plan and Kodak Retirement Income Plan CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Layaou v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Amara v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Sheehan v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Guo v. IBM 401(k) Plus PlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.