Legal Opinion
SRAM Corp. v. AD-II ENGINEERING, INC.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 27, 2003No. 00 C 6675, 01 C 0062PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GETTLEMAN, District Judge.
In these consolidated cases, SRAM Corp. has sued defendant AD-II Engineering, Inc. for infringement of patent no. 5,662,000 (the “ ’000 patent”), and AD-II has sued SRAM for a declaration of non-infringement, tortious interference with prospective business relations, unfair competition in violation of the Lanham Act, the Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act and Illinois common law (jointly as the “unfair competition claims”). SRAM has moved for summary judgment of infringement. AD-II has moved for summary judgment of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- SRAM Corp. v. AD-II ENGINEERING, INC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- SRAM Corp. v. AD-II Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- SRAM Corp. v. AD-II Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004