Legal Opinion
SRAM Corp. v. AD-II ENGINEERING, INC.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 20, 2004No. 00 C 6675PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GETTLEMAN, District Judge.
In these consolidated cases, SRAM Corporation sued defendant AD-II Engineering, Inc., for infringement of two patents: No. 5,662,000 (the “ ’000 patent”) and U.S. Patent Reexamination Certificate B 1 4,900,291 (the “reexamined ’291 patent”). AD-II sued SRAM for a declaration of non-infringement, tortious interference with prospective business relations, unfair competition and violation of the Lanham Act, and violations of the Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and Illinois common law. On July 28, 2002, the parties entered into…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Rexnord Corporation v. The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- O.I. Corporation v. Tekmar Company IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Sunrace Roots Enterprise Co., Ltd. And Sun Victory Trading Co., Inc. v. Sram CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sram Corp. v. Ad-Ii Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- SRAM Corp. v. Sunrace Roots Enterprise Co., Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005