Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Beasley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 20, 1998No. 1961623PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Antoinette J. Beasley petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to vacate its order compelling her to arbitrate her claims against Brookwood Medical Center ("Brookwood"). Beasley maintains that arbitration is inappropriate because the arbitration clause contained in her employee handbook and relied upon by the trial court is not supported by a binding contract. We grant the petition.

I

In March 1995, Brookwood adopted a new employment policy. The policy required all employees, as a condition of employment, to agree to submit employment claims against Brookwood to final and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Deborah Patterson v. Tenet Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. Ex Parte EdgarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. AG Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Diane O'Neil v. Hilton Head HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Bar-S Foods Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Ameriquest Mortg. Co., Inc. v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Nobles v. Rural Community Ins. ServicesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
  4. Baptist Health System, Inc. v. MacKSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. Ex Parte SheltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API