Legal Opinion
United States v. Geiser
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 10, 2008No. 06-4406PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
In this case, we must decide whether Anton Geiser, who served as an armed Nazi concentration camp guard, “personally advocated or assisted in the persecution of ... [a] group of persons because of race, religion, or national origin” and is thus ineligible for a visa under the Refugee Relief Act of 1953, Pub.L. No. 83-203 at § 14(a), 67 Stat. 400, 406 (“RRA”). For the reasons that follow, we conclude that Geiser “personally advocated or assisted in ... persecution” and is ineligible for an RRA visa. Therefore, we will affirm the District Court’s order…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- ACOSTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Elias Eid v. John ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- United States v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Santomenno Ex Rel. John Hancock Trust v. John Hancock Life Insurance Co. (U.S.A)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- American Farm Bureau Federation v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Intermountain Insurance Service of Vail, Ltd. Liability Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2010
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.