Legal Opinion

Transamerica Insurance Group v. Lee

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 17, 1987No. 86-2456PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti

For what it believed to be an egregious violation of the discovery rules by the defendant’s attorneys, the law firm of Parrillo, Weiss & Moss, the trial court entered a $5,000 judgment against the defendant and awarded it to the plaintiff’s attorney as attorney fees. The court based its ruling upon Supreme Court Rules 219(c) and (d), which allow the court to impose “such orders as are just” for violation of the discovery rules, including “attorney’s fees incurred by any party as a result of the misconduct.” (87 Ill. 2d Rules 219(c), (d).) As additional support for its ruling, the court cited…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buehler v. WhalenIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Williams v. A. E. Staley Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hengels v. GilskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. In Re Estate of SoderholmAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kubian v. LabinskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. Ritter v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Dyduch v. Crystal Green Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Freeman v. MyersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Transamerica Insurance Group v. LeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API