Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Soderholm

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 27, 1984No. 83-1761PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

127 Ill. App.3d 871 (1984)

469 N.E.2d 410

In re ESTATE OF MYRTLE B. SODERHOLM (John M. Komala et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Oscar B. Soderholm et al., Defendants-Appellees).

No. 83-1761.

Illinois Appellate Court — First District (4th Division).

Opinion filed September 27, 1984.

Richard C. Moenning, of Chicago, for appellants.

Querrey, Harrow, Gulanick & Kennedy, Ltd., of Chicago (Dennis A. Marks, Victor J. Piekarski, and Michael Resis, of counsel), for appellees.

Order affirmed.

2Opinion of the Court · JigantiJustice Jiganti

The central issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly entered a judgment by default against the plaintiffs,…

3Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Buehler v. WhalenIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Greene v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. ClarkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Schwartz v. MoatsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  5. Williams v. A. E. Staley Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hengels v. GilskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Ritter v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Harris v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. King v. American Food Equipment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Blakey v. Gilbane Building Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API