Eisai, Inc. v. Sanofi Aventis U.S., LLC
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROTH, Circuit Judge:
The antitrust laws are concerned with “the protection of competition, not competitors.” 1 Eisai complains that the conduct of Sanofi Aventis U.S., LLC, and Sanofi U.S. Services, Inc., (Sanofi) jointly and severally harmed competition in the market for anticoagulant drugs by preventing hospitals from replacing Lovenox, one of Sanofi’s drugs, with competing drugs. The facts, however, do not bear out Eisai’s characterization of .market events. For the-reasons stated below,-we conclude that what Eisai calls “payoffs” were, in reality, discounts offered by Sano-fi to its…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Burtch v. Milberg Factors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Host International Inc v. MarketPlace PHL LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Energy Conversion Devices Liquidation Trust v. Trina Solar Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- In re Remicade Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Elizabeth Panzarella v. Navient Solutions IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Pfizer Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson & Janssen Biotech, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.