Legal Opinion

Wood v. Broom

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 18, 1932No. 424PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes

Under the reapportionment pursuant to the Act of June 18, 1929 (c. 28, 46 Stat. 21, 26, 27), Mississippi is entitled to seven representatives in Congress, instead of eight as theretofore. The Legislature of Mississippi, by an act known as House Bill No. 197, Regular Session 1932, divided the State into seven congressional districts. The complainant, alleging that he was a citizen of Mississippi, a qualified elector under its laws, and also qualified to be a candidate for election as representative in Congress, brought this suit to have the redistricting act of 1932 declared invalid and to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Ex Parte Bakelite Corp'n.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Broom v. WoodDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1932

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Colegrove v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Rucho v. Common CauseSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  5. Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API