Legal Opinion

Hansen-Rice, Inc. v. Celotex Corp.

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided February 7, 2006No. CV 04 101 S BLWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

WINMILL, Chief Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The Court has before it various motions. The Court heard oral argument on January 13, 2006, and took the motions under advisement. For the reasons expressed below, the Court will (1) grant the motion to amend to add a claim for punitive damages, (2) deny Celotex’s motion for summary judgment against Hansen-Rice, (3) deny Celotex’s motion for summary judgment against Dow, (4) grant Dow’s motion for summary judgment against Celotex, and (5) deem moot Celotex’s motion to withdraw admissions.

BACKGROUND FACTS

Plaintiff Hansen-Rice builds…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Murray v. Farmers InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Southern Idaho Pipe & Steel Co. v. Cal-Cut Pipe & Supply, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Jones v. Panhandle Distributors, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Dickerson v. Mountain View Equipment Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grunig v. Johnson, IncDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2019
  2. Peregrine Falcon LLC v. Piaggio America, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API