Hansen-Rice, Inc. v. Celotex Corp.
District Court, D. Idaho
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
WINMILL, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The Court has before it various motions. The Court heard oral argument on January 13, 2006, and took the motions under advisement. For the reasons expressed below, the Court will (1) grant the motion to amend to add a claim for punitive damages, (2) deny Celotex’s motion for summary judgment against Hansen-Rice, (3) deny Celotex’s motion for summary judgment against Dow, (4) grant Dow’s motion for summary judgment against Celotex, and (5) deem moot Celotex’s motion to withdraw admissions.
BACKGROUND FACTS
Plaintiff Hansen-Rice builds…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Murray v. Farmers InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Southern Idaho Pipe & Steel Co. v. Cal-Cut Pipe & Supply, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Jones v. Panhandle Distributors, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Dickerson v. Mountain View Equipment Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grunig v. Johnson, IncDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2019
- Peregrine Falcon LLC v. Piaggio America, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2020