Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. Mountain View Equipment Co.

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1985No. 15696PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Dan Dickerson brought a small claims action against Mountain View Equipment Company for the cost of repairing a used tractor previously purchased from the company. The magistrate in the small claims department entered judgment for Dickerson and Mountain View appealed to the district court. After a de novo trial, the district court found that Mountain View had breached two warranties: an implied warranty of merchantability and an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, I.C. §§ 28-2-314, -315. The district court awarded judgment to Dickerson and denied a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Testo v. Russ Dunmire Oldsmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  2. Ontai v. Straub Clinic & Hospital Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Perfetti v. McGhan MedicalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Southerland v. Northeast Datsun, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1983
  5. Cockerham v. WardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Certainteed Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
  3. Beck Enterprises, Inc. v. HesterMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  4. McCormick MacHinery, Inc. v. Julian E. Johnson & Sons, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Meldco, Inc. v. Hollytex Carpet Mills, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API