Legal Opinion

Allied Artists Picture Corp., and Avco Embassy Pictures Corp., Cross-Appellees v. James A. Rhodes, Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1982No. 80-3566, 80-3600PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

An Ohio statute regulating the marketing of motion pictures outlaws “blind bidding” and instead requires suppliers of motion pictures to screen their films in Ohio for all interested theater operators prior to negotiations or bidding. The second feature of the statute under attack is a set of competitive bidding guidelines. Although the statute allows producers and distributors to market films to exhibitors through negotiations rather than competitive bidding, the statute establishes guidelines for competitive bidding if distributors choose bidding as the method of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Okpalobi v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. Baltimore Orioles, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Taquino v. Teledyne Monarch RubberCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API