Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Doerflein

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 1, 1988No. 20566-8-IPublished

1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.

Virginia G. Hansen appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of Fred Doerflein, d/b/a the Northwest Piano and Organ Trust. Hansen contends that the trial court erred in limiting the statutory penalty period for usury to the 1-year term of the usurious promissory note and holding her liable for interest payments accruing after the due date of the note. We reverse and remand for recalculation of the penalty.

I

The issues raised by this appeal are whether a promissory note's default provision setting forth a legal rate of interest merges with the usurious loan provisions of the note to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. O'Brien v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Whitaker v. Spiegel, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Clausing v. Virginia Lee Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Aetna Finance Co. v. DarwinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API