Legal Opinion

Germon v. Noe

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 16, 1942PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.

A small truck driven by the plaintiff was in collision with a Ford sedan operated by the defendant, and this litigation ensued. Apparently the jury concluded that both drivers were at fault. The plaintiff appealed, alleging error in the charge.

The first question presented grows out of the refusal of the trial court to submit to the jury the issue of the right of the plaintiff to recover under the doctrine of supervening negligence. The plaintiff had claimed this right in his complaint and in requests to charge. He offered evidence and claimed to have proved that he was driving east toward…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Correnti v. CatinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Beck v. SosnowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. Wilson v. DunbarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  4. Sinon v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Childs v. BlessoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Doherty v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  3. Reale v. KeanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API