Wilson v. Dunbar
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff, while crossing Commerce Street in Hartford, was struck by an automobile being driven by one of the defendants in the course of his employment by the other. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants and both the plaintiff and the defendants have appealed, the defendants merely seeking certain corrections in the finding. The sole question presented grows out of the refusal of the trial court to submit to the jury the issue of the right of the plaintiff to recover under the doctrine of supervening negligence.
Certain facts stated in the claims of proof of the parties…
2Cited by8 opinions
- DePaola v. SeamourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Caplan v. ArndtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Germon v. NoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Schweitzer v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Schweitzer v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.