Legal Opinion

State v. Marks

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 31, 1996No. 15479PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The sole issue in this appeal1 is whether, pursuant to General Statutes §§ 17b-93 (a)2 *473and 17b-95,3 the plaintiff is entitled to all of the assets of the estate of the defendant’s decedent as part of a *474claim for reimbursement for public assistance payments made on behalf of the decedent, or whether, pursuant to General Statutes § 17b-94 (b),4 the plaintiff is entitled to only 50 percent of the assets of that estate. The defendant, Judith S. Marks, the executrix of the *475estate of the decedent, Frances Serafín, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pollard v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Brill v. UlreySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  3. Forsyth v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Ross v. GiardiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. PetersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Connecticut State Department of Social Services v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
  3. Villano v. PolimeniConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. Hull v. BurwellDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
  5. Connecticut Department Of Social Services v. Michael O. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API