Legal Opinion

Capital Investment Corp. v. King County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 24, 2002No. 26405-6-IIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

In Fidelity Mutual Savings Bank v. Mark,1 the Washington Supreme Court held that a judgment debtor could not transfer a right to redeem without also transferring the underlying interest in the land. In this case, we analogously hold that a redemptioner by judgment lien may not transfer a right to redeem without also transferring the underlying judgment. The trial court so ruled, and thus we affirm.

FACTS

Judgments: In 1997, there were three judgments against Eric Piltz. The judgment creditors were (or would become)2 David Ordell, 5-11 Properties, and Judgment Enforcement Administration (JEA).

Lie…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Home Indemnity Co. v. McClellan Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Morse Electro Products Corp. v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Swanson v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Performance Construction, App/cross-resp v. David Keene, Resp/cross-appCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API