Capital Investment Corp. v. King County
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.
In Fidelity Mutual Savings Bank v. Mark,1 the Washington Supreme Court held that a judgment debtor could not transfer a right to redeem without also transferring the underlying interest in the land. In this case, we analogously hold that a redemptioner by judgment lien may not transfer a right to redeem without also transferring the underlying judgment. The trial court so ruled, and thus we affirm.
FACTS
Judgments: In 1997, there were three judgments against Eric Piltz. The judgment creditors were (or would become)2 David Ordell, 5-11 Properties, and Judgment Enforcement Administration (JEA).
Lie…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Home Indemnity Co. v. McClellan Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- Morse Electro Products Corp. v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Swanson v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1947
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Performance Construction, App/cross-resp v. David Keene, Resp/cross-appCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016