Legal Opinion
RIALTO POLICE BENEFIT ASS'N. v. City of Rialto
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 3, 2007No. E039649PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case presents an issue of first impression: Is a city’s decision to enter into a contract with the county sheriff for law enforcement services, rather than continue to provide such services through the city’s own police department, subject to the meet-and-confer requirements of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA) (Gov. Code, § 3500 et seq.)? We answer the question in the affirmative, and we therefore affirm the trial court’s decision on the issue.
ff. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The City of Rialto (City) is a general law city, and its city…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- First National Maintenance Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Soule Glass and Glazing Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Fire Fighters Union, Local 1186 v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- International Ass'n of Fire Fighters v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- INTERNATIONAL ASSN. OF FIRE FIGHTERS, LOCAL 188, AFL-CIO v. Public Employment Relations Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- L.A. County Professional Peace Officers Assn. v. County of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2026