Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Greany

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 8, 1914PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

This is an action for breach of a covenant against incumbrances, in which the judge * instructed the jury that if they believed the testimony the plaintiff was entitled to nominal damages only.

The incumbrance complained of consisted in a tax duly assessed upon the premises, which confessedly was covered by the covenant. To get rid of the incumbrance caused by the tax the plaintiff paid $84.52, and three days later brought this action.

At the trial the defendant proved that before the plaintiff paid the tax here in question he had conveyed the land by a deed “ containing in the descriptive part…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jump v. LeonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. Berenson v. ConantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Avery v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rogers v. MurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  2. Hall v. Henry Thayer & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Becker v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Goldman v. Noxon Chemical Products Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. St. Albans Granite Co. v. Elwell & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API