Legal Opinion
United States v. Hemmer
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 1, 1984No. Nos. 83-1329 to 83-1331, 83-1375PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MALETZ, Senior Judge.
Defendants-appellants James Hemmer, John Cusick, Michael Marino and Thomas Randazza were indicted for armed bank robbery and conspiracy to rob a national bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(d), 2 and 371 (1976), respectively. Defendant Marino was also charged with receipt, possession and concealment of stolen money in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(c). The district court directed a verdict of not guilty for Marino on the robbery and conspiracy *12counts. The jury found Marino guilty of the possession offense, and his three codefendants guilty as charged.
' On appeal,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- United States v. Johnny Rafael Batista-PolancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Thomas Zichettello, Frank Richardone, Ronald Reale, Richard Hartman, James J. Lysaght, and Peter KramerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Francis E. DevinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Alexander Bortnovsky, A/K/A "Sasha," and Leonid BrazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Gregory M. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.