Legal Opinion

Defloreo v. Tarvin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1942No. 14046PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reid, Chief Justice.

A tenant has an adequate remedy at law by which he may resist or contest a dispossessory-warrant proceeding (Code, § 61:303), and equity will not interfere with such regular process. Johnson v. Thrower, 117 Ga. 1007 (44 S. E. 846); Napier v. Varner, 149 Ga. 586 (101 S. E. 580). But if the primary purpose of a petition in equity is to obtain specific performance of a contract of purchase, equity will entertain the petition, and pending its determination may properly stay the dispossessory proceedings. In Harvey v. Atlanta & Lowry National Bank, 164 Ga. 625 (2) (139 S. E.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sims v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  2. Pope v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Johnson v. ThrowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Vickers v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  5. Napier v. VarnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shippen v. FolsomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Wright v. RosemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. Flynn v. MerckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API