Legal Opinion

Crump & Trezevant, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Grebe

This is a suit on a certain bond, hereinafter considered. There was a decree for complainant for $10,563.75 from which the defendant, Continental Casualty Company, the surety or guarantor, appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the decree of the chancellor and we have granted the casualty company’s petition for cer-tiorari.

Crump & Trezevant is a corporation engaged in the business of making and negotiating loans on real estate, but far the greater part of its business consists in lending directly or indirectly money of the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.

Many building loans are made by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Belloni v. . FreebornNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. In re NegusNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  3. Orinoco Supply Co. v. Shaw Bros. LumberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Lathrop v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1851
  5. Stuart v. CarterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kracman v. Ozark Electric Cooperative, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. American Surety Co. of New York v. FranciscusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  3. Friedman v. Typhoon Air Conditioning Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1962
  4. Robertson v. Citizens' Bank of WatertownTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API