Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Typhoon Air Conditioning Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 16, 1962No. Civ. 20194PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZAVATT, District Judge.
The facts in this matter have, in large part, been stipulated at a pretrial conference held before this court on February 5, 1962. The stipulated facts are as follows:
1. The defendant corporation is a citizen of New York State, having its offices and principal place of business in Brooklyn, New York. It is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling air conditioning units. The plaintiff, a citizen of Tennessee, for a number of years, has been an authorized dealer of the defendant’s air conditioners and has held an exclusive agency covering the •city of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dunn v. . Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Southern Fire & Casualty Co. v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
- Melville Harris, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Leonard Massello and William Massello v. Standard Accident and Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Cohen v. NoelTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
- Davis v. Broad Street GarageTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Center Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Friedman v. Typhoon Air Conditioning Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1962
- Arthur Tickle Engineering Works, Inc. v. Oil Tank Cleaning Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1963
- Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Center Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003