Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Carter

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1916PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Mercer County. Action by W. E. Stuart and others against E.- E. Carter. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Poffenbarger, Judge:

The Judgment complained of on this writ of error, was recovered by motion made under sec. 6, ch. 121, of the Code, upon a joint and several bond given to insure performance of the covenants, conditions and agreements set forth in a certain building contract, and due and prompt payment and discharge of all indebtedness that should be incurred by the contractors in carrying out the same. The owners of the property and obligees in the bond were Hale and Stuart. The contractors were Carter Bros, and Bird. E. E. Carter, the defendant, was the surety in the bond. .

After one…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Belloni v. . FreebornNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Conner v. . ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Bender v. FrombergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  4. In re NegusNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  5. Port v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1819

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Levin v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Westville Land Co. v. HandleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  3. Honolulu Roofing Co. v. FelixHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State Ex Rel. Stout v. RogersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Citizens National Bank v. DixonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API